Tuesday, December 13, 2005

Three thoughts on the Globes

1. In case it's not apparent year after year, the Golden Globes is a silly exercise, providing categories for both drama and comedy films and performances but not for their directors or supporting actors or screenwriters. So there was the usual shafting (no Cronenberg or Frears despite best pic nominations for A History of Violence and Mrs. Henderson Presents), plus the usual ridiculous inclusions prompted by a lukewarm movie year (Sarah Jessica Parker is terrible in The Family Stone, and must we always include Johnny Depp?), plus the genre juggling to fit everyone in (if The Squid and the Whale is a comedy, then the Hollywood Foreign Press is an association of sadists). Everyone better be good and liquored up for the ceremony so we can have some good TV.

2. This is the year of Clooney. George is nominated for directing and writing Good Night, and Good Luck and supporting actor for Syriana -- identical (and deserved) Oscar nominations will follow, which would make him, I think, the first person ever to be nominated for both a performance and direction (for different movies) in the same year. Correct me if I'm wrong.

3. Brokeback Mountain, which continued its awards-season dominance yesterday with a best pic/director/actor trifecta from the New York critics, has a leading seven nominations, including one for best song, which I didn't know it had (further evidence this category should be eradicated across the board). Some might say there is plenty of time for Brokeback to lose momentum (Oscars are conferred March 5), but what film would take its place? ... You see? It played in five screens last weekend and made a half million dollars total, a phenomenal ratio. And when it opens wide this weekend, it'll hit the mother lode. Glowing reviews, stellar box office, no Million Dollar Baby type in sight -- looks virtually unbeatable from here.

P.S. Zero nominations for "Arrested Development" in the TV categories. You're telling me that Charlie Sheen is doing better work than Jason Bateman, whose sublime performance on "AD" should be starmaking? I'm done trying to figure this out.

4 comments:

Middento said...

But Charlie Sheen does fantastic, subtle work. He is a model for our country's youth and --

*thwack*

Oh, sorry about that. My brain had temporarily been taken over. You're right, Sheen and his damn show are piffle.

(Heh, I like that word today.)

PS to JJ -- check out the comments section for the B post on my blog, you'll be amused.

bagels, boobs, and beer said...

I was at an NYC theater for Brokeback Friday night at 11:15- it was sold out, as were all the other times. And judging by LiveJournal buzz, people are screaming for it in the states not planning to screen it any time soon. Hmm, could this film be filling some kind of hole among the usual H'wood offerings??

Also, WTF mates- the female comedy noms go to all 4 Desperate Housewives and Mary Louise Parker?? Uh- where the AD ladies at? I am happy Hugh Laurie got a nom, but why did House get snubbed?

J.J. said...

The housewives can kiss my ass. And it's great that Prison Break is nominated. That -- along with House -- is the f*cking show that's booting out AD. I find this all too shocking.

bagels, boobs, and beer said...

They've decided to keep House in it's Tuesday timeslot, so I don't think it could be booting out AD. Which I hear Showtime wants to pick up. So we'll see...